Categories
Governance News

Thinking about one of your execs joining another company’s board…

Thinking about one of your execs joining another company’s board. Here are a few things you might want to consider.

Typically, such service takes one of these three forms.

  1. Development Opportunity. Sometimes companies encourage execs to serve on other boards as a “development opportunity.”
  2. Service on Behalf of the Employing (Your!) Company. Sometimes, the exec’s employer asks the exec to serve on the board or as an officer of another company in which the employer’s company has an investment (Think joint venture or less than 100% investment in another company).
  3. On Their Own. Means just what it says. Often execs see board service as a path to a CEO role, a rounding-out experience, a way to raise their profile and increase career options.

A few practical considerations…

Board Compensation. Whose money is it anyway?

If an exec is serving on behalf of your company, be clear about:

  • Director fees: Often cash fees are paid directly to employing company. This ensures that there is no confusion that the exec represents the investing employer. How cash fees (current or deferred) are managed may also have implications for the exec’s personal tax reporting  
  • Director stock compensation:  Plans vary greatly. Sort out in what form and to whom units or shares will be issued. Reporting the grants and vesting of these units or shares can be quite a technical exercise.

If this is a “development opportunity,” get clear with the exec whether the exec keeps the compensation – and the implications of that arrangement for your exec and your company.

Trading and Inside Information Policies. Look hard at your company’s policy and the policy at the company where your exec will serve. Do they cover anticipated scenarios? Which company or individual will be responsible for SEC filings reporting on director stock compensation or transactions?

Interlocking Directorates. One can inadvertantly run afoul of Section 8 of the Clayton Act’s  prohibitions on interlocking directorates, i.e., competing corporations are represented on each other’s boards. It also bars anyone from serving as a director or officer of any two competitors, where “the elimination of competition by agreement between them would constitute a violation of the antitrust laws.” There are some exemptions and a safe harbor. Best to do this research beforehand. Here is a link to a helpful Skadden memo. https://www.skadden.com/insights/publications/2021/06/the-informed-board/interlocking-boards

Purchasing Policy/Supply Chain. Consider the information that your exec could learn through board service about your company’s suppliers – and the implications of that information for your exec’s involvement in your supply chain.

Company Resources. Most companies have a policy limiting the use of company resources to corporate purposes. If your exec is serving on his or her own, likely your company resources are off limits and your exec should use paid time off to cover attendance at board meetings.

Things can become grey when your company encourages board service as a development opportunity. Is this within the scope of the exec’s job? Must your exec take paid time off to attend the other company’s board meetings? How much support can your company provide to your exec? Can your exec’s secretary print out the other company’s board briefing materials for your exec using your company’s equipment? Can your exec use your company travel team to plan exec travel to and from meetings? Can your exec use your company plane to attend these meetings?

But, let’s say your exec is serving on a board or as an officer of another company on behalf of your company. Your company resources policy likely allows that exec to use company resources to support that activity – because it is in furtherance of your company’s investment.

Risk Management:

  • D&O Insurance Coverage. Address this aspect with your D&O broker before your exec’s service begins. Assume that the other company’s D&O policy will cover your exec serving as a director representing your company an investor. Might, might not. Understand how your company’s coverage will work. Finally, if it’s unclear on whose behalf your exec undertakes board service (that “development opportunity” greyness is hard to escape), D&O coverage may not be there when needed.
  • Indemnification Analyze the indemnification and advancement provisions in your company’s organic documents. In addition, some companies adopt a policy that lays out how these provisions are actually implemented in various circumstances.

Benefits/Workers Compensation. Whether the exec’s service is within the scope of employment can determine whether your company’s business travel accident or life insurance coverage and workers compensation applies if the exec is injured or killed in connection with that service. Unfortunately, it happens. Be clear from the get go.

Information Security. Each of these three forms of service should prompt examination of how your exec will or won’t use your company’s IT and/or email for communications in connection with service at the other company. That usage could expose your company to disruptive information requests from regulators or litigants arising from the other company’s business.

Conclusion: With your exec joining another company’s board, like life, there is risk to assess and manage.

Categories
Governance News

Annual Meetings – 2021 Style

In 2020, companies, shareholders, and service providers had to pivot quickly from in-person to virtual annual meetings to comply with restrictions imposed due to COVID-19.

Now, the 2021 annual meeting season is here. Most companies, shareholders, and service providers are pro-actively planning for virtual annual meetings. As they plan, they are leveraging lessons learned in and best practices coming out of the 2020 virtual meetings.

Our distinguished Advisory Board member, Doug Chia, followed and reported extensively on 2020 virtual annual meetings. He’s doing the same in 2021.

Here, Doug reports on four early birds that have already held their virtual annual meetings: Visa, Apple, Disney, and AmerisourceBergen.

Stay tuned for additional reports from Doug on 2021 virtual annual shareholder meetings.

https://www.soundboardgovernance.com/post/virtual-annual-meetings-2021-pre-season-special

Categories
Governance News

A Timely Recommendation…

Corporations Should Reconsider the Value of Their Political Action Committees

We are happy to share Douglas K. Chia’s’s timely memo about board oversight of corporate political activities, especially PACs. You can find it on Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance: https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/02/08/corporations-should-reconsider-the-value-of-their-political-action-committees/. Mr. Chia, a valued member of our Advisory Board, observes that “corporate political spending has long been an issue in corporate governancere” and predicts it “will become a bigger board issue.”

Notably, Foresight’s recommended agenda topics include an annual “Report on Government Relations Programs and Compliance.”

A bit about Douglas K. Chia:

Mr. Chia is sole owner and President of Soundboard Governance LLC and Fellow at the Rutgers Center for Corporate Law and Governance. Previously, he was Executive Director of The Conference Board ESG Center and continues to contribute to The Conference Board as a Senior Fellow. He is also an Adjunct Professor at Fordham University School of Law.​​

Before joining The Conference Board in 2016, Mr. Chia served as Assistant General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Johnson & Johnson. Previously, he served as Assistant General Counsel, Corporate of Tyco International. He also practiced law at the global firms Simpson Thacher & Bartlett and Clifford Chance in New York and Hong Kong.​​

Mr. Chia has held a number of central leadership positions in the corporate governance field, including Chair of the Board of the Society for Corporate Governance, President of the Stockholder Relations Society of New York, and member of the New York Stock Exchange Corporate Governance Commission. He is a current member of the American Bar Association’s Corporate Laws Committee and the National Asian Pacific American Bar Association. Mr. Chia has received numerous awards and recognitions in corporate governance. He has frequently appeared in the news media, including CNN, NPR Marketplace, The Wall Street Journal, Financial Times, and The New Yorker.

Mr. Chia received an A.B. degree from Dartmouth College and a J.D. degree from the Georgetown University Law Center. ​

Categories
Governance News

Going Virtual Again?

GET INFORMED, GET READY FOR YOUR 2021 VSM

This past spring, COVID hit annual meeting season hard. Companies and service providers scrambled to convert from traditional in-person annual meetings to virtual annual meetings. In the process, people worked together to address challenges, handle new situations. In the process, they learned a lot!

Now, three brain trusts have combined to produce the Report of the 2020 Multi-Stakeholder Working Group on Practices for Virtual Shareholder Meetings. Those three are:

  • Rutgers Center for Corporate Law and Governance,
  • The Council of Institutional Investors, and
  • The Society for Corporate Governance.

The Report looks back at 2020 VSMs; ahead to 2021 VSMs. Given the continued uncertainty about the pandemic, many companies are planning 2021 VSMs, rather than in-person ASMs. And, it may also be that enough people have actually decided they like VSMs.

The Report captures the 2020 lessons learned. It then provides practical, actionable planning suggestions for 2021 VSMs. The Report should serve as a useful resource for those issuers planning and drafting proxies statements for 2021 ASM/VSMs in the coming weeks. And, it should also help others involved in the process – service providers, investors, and more.

Many thanks to Douglas Chia of Rutgers and a member of our own Advisory Board for facilitating this Herculean effort.

Thanks also to CII, the Society, Steve Haas (legal counsel), and numerous members of the Working Group and Steering Committee.

Link to the Report here: https://bit.ly/377DMpA

Categories
Governance News

Investors want more.

More board diversity. More disclosure about board diversity.

Illinois Treasurer Michael W. Frerichs is leading the Russell 3000 Board Diversity Disclosure Initiative. In a recent letter, the Initiative asks Russell 3000 companies to disclose board racial, ethnic and gender data. Twenty-one investor organizations (collective $3 trillion in assets) signed the letter calling on those companies to “consider publicly reporting the racial/ethnic and gender composition of the Board of Directors in your annual proxy statement for the 2021 filing.” The signers called voluntary corporate reporting “the most reliable data source.” https://bit.ly/34Cm4Jt

Investors see the positive correlation between diverse boards have and corporate performance. Therefore, investors want increased board diversity and more disclosure about board diversity so they can better assess boards.

To date, companies providing diversity data have usually provided aggregated data. E.g. 22% of our board is female, rather than Jane Smith is Female. Looking ahead, companies may want to provide disaggregated data to investors.

Companies considering doing so may first want to ask their directors whether they self-identify with one or more racial/ethnic groups (typically EEOC groups), self-identify with a gender, and consent to the company making that information public in 2021 proxy statements. Obtaining this information from the directors themselves is good due diligence and allows companies to address any potential concerns in good time. Conveniently, companies can add these questions to the annual D&O Questionnaire.

Categories
Governance News

Climate Change for your board.

Climate Week 2020 is over. But, your investors will continue to have interest in your company’s approach to Climate Change. They may:

  • Invest more in or divest (Unless investor is an index fund, in which case, see #2.)
  • Engage regarding role of climate in your strategy
  • Vote FOR or AGAINST the nominees on your director slate
  • Vote FOR or AGAINST your Say of Pay proposal
  • Submit or vote on climate-related shareholder proposals
  • Ask for additional disclosure about climate-related risk
  • Ask how your climate-change goals inform your lobbying

Investor interest in Climate Change has implications for your board’s 2020 and 2021 agenda.

Here we explore 7 ways that your board can address your investors’ interest in Climate Change by incorporating Climate Change into board agendas. We suggest using various agenda topics (from the Foresight® library of agenda topics) to do that.

1. Understand How Your Investors Use Climate Change Risk to Screen Portfolio Companies

More investors, especially long-term investors, favor companies that are more climate-risk aware. They believe such companies are likely to perform better over the long-term. They are looking for companies with climate-risk aware boards. So, more investors are using some sort of climate-risk or broader ESG screen to determine which companies to invest in, retain, or divest.

Agenda Topic: Review investor base and priorities

Include information in briefing materials and board discussion about how climate-related risk influences your investors’ (and target investors’) Invest/Divest decisions. 

Agenda Topic: Review strategically significant environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks 

This report by management elevates for board review the company’s environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks — including Climate Change. ESG factors cover a wide spectrum of issues that traditionally are not part of financial analysis, yet may have financial relevance – such as the company’s response to Climate Change. Those issue could include various topics, including, for example: product packaging, water usage, health and workplace safety policies, supply chains practices (e.g., labor, raw materials, emissions, waste).

2. Prepare for Effective Investor Engagement

Reflecting their interest in climate-related risk, investors may want to learn more about your company’s approach to climate-related risk or to encourage your company to take action to identify and more aggressively address climate change risk. Prepare!

Agenda Topic: Review annual shareholder and proxy advisory firm engagement program

Include information in briefing materials discussion about how the company’s plans to bring its climate-risk message to investors – during analyst calls, at outreach meetings with the proxy voting teams at major or investors, and in conversation with proxy advisory firms.           

3. Present a Climate- Informed Director Slate

Investors are increasingly looking hard at board composition – including looking for directors with experience that prepares them to effectively oversee climate-related risks and strategic opportunities.  

Agenda Topic: Review board composition and refreshment – including diversity

Take a look at your board. Your directors do not all need to be Climate Change experts. But, your board and company benefit from directors with relevant experience dealing with and leading through scientific challenges and opportunities in the business context. In-depth discussion of your board’s talent and needs can produce a rigorous, short- and long-term director recruiting plan designed to bring beneficial and useful climate-relevant experience and perspectives onto the board.

Agenda Topic: Recommend director development plans

If the board does not include directors who understand and can effectively converse in the boardroom and with investors about science in a business context, consider adding science-focused training to your board’s and directors’ annual development plans.

Agenda Topic: Approve director nominees for inclusion in proxy statement

The governance/nominating committee may want to describe how climate-related experience impacted nominee selection and include infomration about all nominees’ climate-related experience.   

4. Consider Whether Compensation Programs Can Incentivize Climate-Friendly Behaviors and Programs

Investors recognize that compensation programs reflect corporate priorities and drive behavior. For some companies, which may mean incorporating climate-related goals and measurements into compensation metrics.

Agenda Topic: Approve compensation philosophy

“What gets measured gets managed.” As the company advances its thinking about the role of climate change (even as a subset of Sustainability) in its strategy and operations, the compensation committee may want to incorporate climate-change or sustainability-related goals and measures into its compensation philosophy.   

 Agenda Topic: Recommend say-on-pay proposal and disclosure for inclusion in the annual proxy statement

Annually, the board explains and submits its executive compensation actions to investor scrutiny. If climate-change or sustainability metric(s) are included in the company’s compensation program, note that and explain why. And, explain how those metrics impacted executive compensation.

5. Anticipate and Respond to Shareholder Proposals on Climate Change

During the 2020 proxy season, investors filed some 140 climate-related shareholder proposals. Those proposals addressed topics such as carbon asset risk, lobbying disclosure, board oversight of climate and sustainability, greenhouse gas emissions, clean energy, plastics, and recycling, financed emissions, deforestation, water risks, and sustainability reporting.

  • The average vote FOR was 30% (up from 26% in 2019).
  • Several won majority FOR votes (up from only 1 in 2019). A proposal requesting a report on the alignment of Dollar Tree’s business strategy with constraints posed by climate change earned a 73% FOR vote.
  • Proponents withdrew about 40% of the shareholder proposals when negotiations resulted in companies committing to address the proposal’s issue.

Though the SEC’s recent rule changes may alter the shareholder proposal landscape somewhat, the overall cadence will likely remain: indication of investor concern, submission of shareholder proposal, possible submission of no-action request by company, negotiation, and, absent an agreement to withdraw, a vote on the proposal.  

Agenda Topic: Review annual meeting preparations

Late in 3Q or early in 4Q, the governance committee generally looks ahead to the next annual meeting and considers evolving issues. That discussion should cover any new or challenging topics likely to be the subject of a shareholder proposal and consideration of the value of proactive outreach.

Agenda Topic: Review shareholder proposals and approve statements in opposition

If a shareholder proposal meets Rule 14a-8’s requirements, the company may seek to negotiate withdrawal. If negotiation fails, the board may include a statement in opposition in the proxy materials (if it does not support the shareholder proposal) or a statement in support (if it supports the proposal). 

6. Consider What Investors Wants to See about Climate Change in Your Disclosure

Numerous ESG reporting frameworks have been developed by different organizations. They vary in emphasis, complexity, scope, and depth. None satisfies everyone. It is good for the board to be acquainted the board with the leading models in this space and with your investors’ climate-related disclosure preferences. Here is one example. According to Vanguard’s 2020 proxy season investment stewardship report:

  • “Vanguard expects companies to disclose to the market how their board oversees climate-related strategy and risk management. We look for companies to provide quantitative disclosure of their performance metrics and progress against goals.”
  • “A number of widely recognized industry frameworks provide useful guidelines for companies that seek to improve their sustainability disclosure. We support the framework created by the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures for disclosing strategy, risk management, governance, metrics, and targets. We expect the TCFD to continue to gain acceptance as a global standard (see the table on the next page). The Sustainability Accounting Standards Board produces useful industry-specific, materiality-oriented sustainability disclosure standards. We also support industry efforts with broad adoption, such as the Edison Electric Institute’s sustainability reporting template for U.S. electric utilities.”

Agenda Topic: Approve SEC Form 10-K

In connection with its review of the company’s Form 10-K, the board may want to consider what materials climate-change related information should be included in the Form 10-K or provided to investors in other formats, e.g., on the website, in a separate report.

7. Consider What Goals Inform Your Company’s Lobbying

Every business is subject to regulation of some sort in every jurisdiction in which it does business. That regulation can have impact on the Company’s results, reputation, strategy, product mix, and more.

Agenda Topic: Review annual report on regulatory environment

At least annually, management reports to the board (or a board committee) regarding the current and anticipated regulatory environment. That report should include information about significant company (and industry group the company supports) initiatives to influence the regulatory environment related to Climate Change.

Conclusion

Incorporting Climate Change elements into board agenda topics can improve your company’s preparedness and position with investors. It can also help your board address climate-related risk and strategic opportunities. Foresight’s agenda topic library, agenda management capabilities and curated information resources can make this approach easy for Corporate Secretaries and General Counsels.

Categories
Governance News

How DOJ Compliance Update Impacts Boards

DOJ Compliance Update: What does it mean for Boards?

In June 2020, the US Department of Justice (“DOJ”) issued updated corporate compliance guidance1.

What Stays the Same? DOJ continues to urge companies to:

  1. Adopt a risk-based compliance program, based on results of a rigorous assessment of the company’s risks,
  2. Embed preventative and detective controls tailored to those particular risks, and
  3. Be data driven in monitoring the effectiveness of those controls.

What Changes? The update suggests that the DOJ will be looking more closely at whether a company’s compliance program:

  1. Is adequately resourced,
  2. Has formalized processes to evaluate its effectiveness on an ongoing basis,
  3. Incorporates the use of data analytics, and
  4. Addresses relevant cross-border implications.

Why is This Update Important? More than ever, company reputation impacts shareholder value. A well-run compliance program is important to company reputation. It can give investors, employees (current and prospective), suppliers, customers, and communities a real sense of the company and its commitment to integrity. Compliance is also a key element in risk management.

What Does This Mean for Your Board’s Oversight of Risk and Compliance programs?  To get a better understanding of what the DOJ update means for your company and board, here are several questions that your directors might want to ask the company’s Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) when the CCO next reports to your board or board committee. If a CCO report is not on an upcoming agenda, it would be good to add it!

Are We Resourcing Our Program Appropriately? In the past, the DOJ’s asked whether your compliance program was “being implemented effectively.” Going forward, the DOJ is likely to also ask whether your program is “adequately resourced and empowered to function effectively.” As COVID is prompting companies to cut budgets where they can, it would be good to talk with your CCO about whether the company is providing appropriate budget and authority to run the compliance program. It might not be a “yes/no” question and it is a good one to ask regularly as your company’s business evolves.

Data is a resource too. Asking your CCO about IT support being provided to the compliance function is important because the DOJ is looking for companies to provide compliance personnel with the data they need for “timely and effective monitoring and/or testing of policies, controls, and transactions.”

How Are We Using Ongoing, Data-Driven Processes to Ensure Our Program’s Effectiveness? The DOJ is still looking at whether your compliance program is effective but it also wants to see that your company has formalized processes to evaluate your program, those processes are generating useful data, and your company is updating its program based on those evaluations and data. No more will you receive credit for updates made “in light of lessons learned.” It would be good to talk with your CCO about how your company would demonstrate that:

  1. Review of your compliance program is “based upon continuous access to operational data and information across functions,” and
  2. Your program includes a formalized tracking process to track your company’s and compliance developments in your industry.

Are We Making It Easy for Employees to be Compliant? The DOJ also wants companies to make compliance easy for employees. Consider talking with your CCO about whether your company’s policies and procedures are readily available and searchable so employees can find pertinent provisions. And it would be good to ask how your CCO tracks the most accessed policies and what that tells the CCO.

Is Our Training Effective? The DOJ will ask, so consider asking your CCO:

  1. How is our company evaluating our training’s effectiveness?
  2. How do our employees get answers to questions or issues prompted by our training?

Do Our Acquisition Plans Include a Post-Acquisition Compliance Audit?  

In What Ways are We Multi-National? Few companies are purely domestic. Supply chains, IT/data and sales can easily take a “domestic” company outside the US. It’s not easy to structure a multi-national compliance program given variations in laws and circumstances in each of the countries where a company does business. Talk with the CCO about the how the company’s compliance program takes into account the multi-national aspects of your business and what rationale your company uses in support of compliance decisions made in a multi-national context, including how those decisions “maintain the integrity and effectiveness” of your compliance program.

Conclusion

Hopefully, these suggestions can form the basis for an ongoing, dynamic interchange between the board (or the audit or risk committee) and your CCO. And that interchange can help the CCO and company in efforts to improve compliance and mitigate risk in line with DOJ guidance.

_____________________

1 U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Criminal Division, “Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs” (June 1, 2020), https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/page/file/937501/download.

Categories
Governance News

From the AICPA: COVID’s Impact on the Audit Committee

COVID-19 is changing how and where we conduct business as well as how we approach both human capital management and corporate strategy. Those changes have implications for risk, controls, and reporting.

The Association of International Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) has been advising its members and others how best to handle COIVD-19 challenges. Recently, the AICPA shared the audit committee checklist for COVID-19https://bit.ly/3g4BzO7

The AICPA, in issuing the checklist, wrote: “Audit committees, be they in a public, private, government or not-for-profit entity, face drastic challenges. Not only must they suddenly conduct virtual meetings, but they also must handle emerging risks. These risks are related to assessments, entity on-site operations (including culture), the impact of new legislation, financial and reporting disclosures, technology and cybersecurity.”

AICPA’s checklist includes thoughtful and practical topics for boards, especially audit committees, to consider when assessing how COVID-19 has impact the “board’s responsibilities of oversight, risk management and governance process.” It is also a good reminder that effective oversight, risk management and governance begins with a well-crafted agenda supported by high-quality briefing materials.

Foresight is advanced technology that enables governance professionals, executives and board members build such agenda, document discussions and decisions, and assess how effectively the board is overseeing these evolving challenges. More information is available on https://foresight.board-ops.com/

Categories
Governance News

CGP Advisory Board Member Bob Mednick Honored

Congratulations to Bob Mednick, who will be inducted into the Accounting Hall of Fame at the American Accounting Association (AAA) conference in August 2020.  Perhaps this completes Bob’s trifecta.  Ten years ago, the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) honored Bob with its lifetime achievement award (the IFAC Global Leadership Award), which is awarded to only one person worldwide once every four years. As the AAA reported in its announcement of this newest honor, Bob “is the only person to hold that award and the AICPA Gold Medal of Distinction, the AICPA’s highest recognition for lifetime contributions to the profession.”

We very much appreciate Bob’s many contributions to Foresight, Corporate Governance Partner’s cutting-edge board management software.

Categories
Governance News

The way forward…

Larry Fink’s March 30 letter to BlackRock shareholders included this observation about the impact of COVID-19 on business and investing:

“…Even more profoundly, people worldwide are fundamentally rethinking the way we work, shop, travel and gather. When we exit this crisis, the world will be different. Investors’ psychology will change. Business will change. Consumption will change. And we will be more deeply reliant on our families and each other to stay safe.”

Indeed, things have changed and will continue to change! Both public and private boards are under greater internal and external scrutiny as COVID-19 tests them in new ways. We have been rethinking how boards, executives and corporate governance professionals do their work. The result: Foresight®, a cloud-based knowledge-management and decision-support tool for planning, preparing for, conducting, documenting, and evaluating board meetings